They need to be stamping out the hidden cameras because there are very few instances in which hiding the fact that you're filming someone is applicable or acceptable. End quote. Besides these disguised cameras, often marked as nanny cams, other miniaturized devices, such as tracking tags and other Internet of things tech, have been used to harass people
phil spade
@Phil · 1:44
And I think that same logic could probably be applied to these products where Amazon just kind of, again, washes their hands and says, you know what, that's up for you to be aware of, not us. This is a marketplace and these are third parties that we are just transacting business for. If I had to guess, I'm almost positive that's what Amazon tried to dismiss the lawsuit on right away
Evelyn Phipps
@LadyFi · 3:00
So I would say if you're questioning whether you have hidden cameras or not, and your house, and I'm going to try to link something here, Biodetector, that's the best way to know
bob dennis
@Urbanlegends · 0:44
So can they say they're justified in doing that, even though one is invasive, that being the spy cam, and the other one being discovery, which is, of course, the unit that that's looking for them. So I don't know that they should really have any of that, the kind of thing. But I guess they've always been available in one form or another from somebody somewhere. And I guess I would buy the discovery unit and stick with that, especially when traveling