Calvin Davis
@Crippledthought · 1:15
Changing versus evolving
So when someone tells you things have to evolve, you to watch how they evolve. Because what they may be meaning to say is things have to change. And sometimes when things have to change, they don't always change for the better. Hope that makes sense
Rocío (Ro) Christensen
@rocio · 0:44
Yeah, I like this. I think the Pokemon visual is very helpful in illustrating the point that you're making, because also, I think evolving right. In those Pokemon evolutions, it was always, like, expanding on the characteristics of the Pokemon. Right. It was like they they changed. Sure. But it was more like an amplification of that they already had
Calvin Davis
@Crippledthought · 2:21
So I definitely appreciate your noticing my analogy. I also like how you said that when the Pokemon evolved, they became a bigger application of who they already were, because that's what I always thought. It's almost like when Squirtle evolved into blastoids, you didn't really change, you just got stronger and learnt more attacks. Or how Pikachu still hasn't evolved into ride you after all these years because it was Pikachu's goal to become the best Pikachu he could be before he changed