The power of the army can be misused in this way and it could cause a huge it could cost a hazardous price to the social economy, social harmony of this nation. And secondly, a trained serviceman who is trained for two years and after that, when he serves the country, he serves for twelve years. But will this agnivir serve for the country in the same way our servicemen do?
Megha Peelwan
@me__gha · 2:52
As this policy also said that after four years the people were retired from army and they got a government job and there is many more policies about it. But yeah, these policies counter very much. And I think one of the things of countering this Agnivir and it lead to protest is that people thought because the people who were in army they got many benefits, especially after recruitment, they got the pension. But in this Agnivir, after retirement sorry, after retirement, they got the pension
Ashwin Kulkarni
@Ak_talks · 3:00
Tell me a thing for four years who will be ready to risk their life? It could sound bitter, but it's the truth. For four years, a young boy why will he put his life in the risk in the difficult situation where he's getting nothing in return? See, Ma'am, patriotism is a thing. But patriotism comes with a price. And that price government should pay. You can't on the name of cost cutting or budget cutting. You can't just do experiments with army