Of course, there's no audience but to explain that your eyes, the eyes you lost that many eyeballs in one year is inexplicable. Now. I know they lost the guy who's been producing the show every year. There's a new guy in charge. I forgot his name. But because of all the controversy with the Grammys, I don't see why they haven't let everybody go. 50% down. One of the things
Dewuan .
@FryedOreo · 4:59
It doesn't matter what network is programming it and what time they're going to watch it, or is it available in their on demand queue? I can watch it whenever I want. I don't have to wait for History Channel to roll it out. I can watch History Channel without History Channel needing to be involved. So I say all that to say this the Grammys
Tommy B
@TommyB3000 · 2:34
Now I think everything is predictable. People know what they're going to get so s***. Excuse me. If I know what I'm going to get, then why waste my time, do something else with that time and watch it on demand? There's nothing compelling. There's nothing that says to a viewer or a listener. Hey, you need to be in the moment
Dewuan .
@FryedOreo · 4:57
They don't care anymore to turn on the television and flick through channels to see what is on you now can control that as I stated before. And I think honestly, my generation just doesn't care about the Grammys all that much, not as much as probably your generation did, where I don't even hear rappers brag about getting Grammys anymore. And if anything, they're a shame to get a Grammy