@IronHeart
Komal Rajput
@IronHeart · 0:37

Theory: Hidden energy source?

article image placeholderUploaded by @IronHeart
Hi everyone. So this one is really interesting as well. There actually exists a conspiracy theory that there exists a pollution free, low cost or no cost technologically viable energy source that is actually being supported pressed by the government, corporations or advocacy groups so that they can benefit of it. And the thing is that people believe that big companies that are associated with fossil fuel or with the nuclear industry, they might face a very hefty loss. What's your point of view on this?

There has been no proof of the same, despite many arguments made even by prevalent people.

4
@Krishnaroxs
Krishna Telang
@Krishnaroxs · 1:24
First of all, hey, Aaron Hart, I heard you was well crossed and it was awesome. And yeah, I totally agree with this conspiracy theory because come on, we're in the 21st century and we haven't found a clean source of energy yet. It's a joke. And secondly, the greatest scientists of all time, Nikola Tesla, he wanted to give out free energy to everyone. It was his goal to provide free and clean energy to the people
@DocSethi
Darpan Sethi
@DocSethi · 2:05
That being said, it definitely will be better if citizens shift to solar energy because you don't have to run those lines all across the country and save a lot of infrastructure costs for the government as well. So that being said, I don't believe in such a theory because if it were true, the government would be the most enthusiastic proponent of that site source
@DocSethi
Darpan Sethi
@DocSethi · 1:25
But we dropped the idea of the thorium plant after running a pilot plant for some years because there was not enough investment put into the thorium plant concept. And we just stopped the plan somewhere around 2000 or 2010 without giving sufficient reasons. And that is probably because we don't want to get into a geopolitical fight with France over producing a better production a nuclear power and give it to the world because there's no investment in that. So that is at least my explanation
@Krishnaroxs
Krishna Telang
@Krishnaroxs · 1:12
And yeah, like you said, nuclear, it is expensive, but the output from that expense is mind blowing. So it is still a good investment. So we are not talking about the existing energy sources. We are talking about an energy source that was invented, that was efficient, which was more effective, which was just enabled, but sadly wasn't able to hit the market because the market is dominated by, you know, s***** people
@Aryan1Kalra
Aryan Kalra
@Aryan1Kalra · 0:48
Don't think so. That would be possible, because except for the government, there are many open organizations or scientists. At least somebody would have mentioned something about it. For example, even aliens, you might say that the government might be hired getting aliens from us. You can say, but we have an idea. Right. But there is no idea exactly of that clean source. And secondly, why would the government itself want to not provide that source to everybody?
2
Swell user mugshot
0:000:00