So where from the noball thing comes. So I'll be telling you that a no ball is given. When a bowler oversteps by a few inches, a bowler is penalized. So if the same thing goes for the batsman, a nonstrike or Batman tries to take advantage by leaving his crease, why not the Batman penalized yes or no? So if no ball is legal, why not mankind? Over the years, cricket has become a batting friendly game
Rajat Ghosh
@RAJAT_GHOSH · 0:53
Yes it is 100% legal from logbook but it harms the sports speed because you are taking wickets completely by putting your no effort. Okay. And as far as batsman's view, it's totally so much disheartening or it's too much painful that assume that a Batman is betting at 99, then you are man cutting him. So yes, you are legally correct. But we all know that cricket is a gentleman's game. So we are harming that conception
Amiyo Saha
@amiyo222 · 0:35
See, my point is clear. The thing is, in Cricut, we have two aspects, batting and bowling, okay? So we need to have some balance, right? So if a bowler is getting, getting penalized for just overstepping by a few inches, why not the basement penalize, right? So, man, getting is 100% legal, okay? Because you can't just favor the batsman all round. You need to have something called the boilers. Right?
arpit pandey
@arpit.077 · 0:17
See mankinding I think should be made illegal because actually you are dismissing a batsman without any real efforts on the ground. At least you should put some effort out. There should be a fault on the part of batsman but actually it is nothing of that part so it should really be banned
Amiyo Saha
@amiyo222 · 0:42
So I don't understand how can you say that there is no real effort on the part of the bowler and next you said no fault of the basement so it is there in the law book that if you are out of the Creek, if a vast man is out of his Grace he can be run out. So if you want mankinding to be illegal then run out should also be illegal
And this term man cutting should not be named after him or something related to him because that maybe that doesn't signify the right means of representation of his name in the sports. And I think the name of this act of mankinding should be changed from its original one to another one because that will not maybe highlight the way the market played his cricket. And so I think of this as that thank you for this