Why not focus on your opinion or what you can prove as opposed to the disapproval of something, but making sure that, hey, I'm right. Like I said, it's about agenda, it's about their angle. And they want to use the other side, the sign they don't agree with to validate. But remember, it's all exposure. Sooner or later, it all becomes kind of newsworthy because they make it that way. Sooner or later, it's all content
Because there's so many different contributing factors. But they have to come up with some way in order to keep tension drama and keep people tuning in. And so it's easy to go the route of all of the negatives instead of what someone stands for. On the other hand, I'm not sure that the ideal news channel news source would be bias
Theo Seibold
@Thatoneweirdo · 5:00
So people will tune in and click, and it's just more to hear from this individual and not just him, there's other individuals on all sides where it's like, hey, tone it down like other people are going to know. But I think you make a good point of removing that bias. News isn't just news anymore. And you also made another good point about the fact that there was a time where you just got the news and you didn't get it 24 hours a day
Swell Team
@Swell · 0:15
Theo Seibold
@Thatoneweirdo · 4:23
So it's never just this is who they are. It's this is who they are. Oh, and by the way and they want to get in their little jams and they want to get in their little blurbs to kind of put the feelers out there. And I just miss news. I just miss news. I miss just the straight aim of being informed, and I really just hate the fact that it doesn't happen the way it used to. I miss that
It used to be even the newspapers, if something happened, sometimes it would end up on page. I don't know. I'm going to pick a random number, 710. I don't know what the specific pages signify because I know some pages are for specific things, but instead of being front page news, it was a tiny little blurb on a further in page. Right? And this is really what this should have been and then it wouldn't have been
Theo Seibold
@Thatoneweirdo · 4:55
You're. Hey, it's Theo. Thank you again for chiming in, and I'm glad I was able to brighten your day a little bit. And it's weird because, you know, as kind of aforementioned, like, news, news organizations, media outlets, I mean, they've always played some type of angle, in my opinion
Renee Slay
@Renee_Slay · 1:29
It's. Hi, Theo. It's Renee. I just wanted to jump in on this conversation a little bit because I think that news media stations are not supposed to have an opinion, but I think many do. And I think also, what better way to control the masses than to feed them certain things, right? So, politics, how would you control the vote? Well, you would sway them to your opinion by the types of articles you write
Theo Seibold
@Thatoneweirdo · 4:55
And they think if you reach the point where you just can't get you can't agree on something just as they say, we agree to disagree. And that's okay too, just as a matter of how it's handled. But we see what a lot of these places, a lot of these news outlets, these media outlets, is that if you don't agree with them or you hold an opinion of your own, you're wrong
Renee Slay
@Renee_Slay · 3:43
But yeah, I agree with you completely. Um, but yeah, I am that person where most of the time I am open and then won't be on certain issues. But news does need to be news because if you don't have the right facts, then where are you forming your opinion from? Got to be careful because they can put out whatever and that's the truth. And that's a part of that control thing, too. Anyway, Theo, keep them coming