@Howie
Howie Rubin
@Howie · 1:07

Facebook problem

The systems in and of themselves are not fast enough good enough to filter out everything that you want to filter out on a very real time basis. This also is something that hopefully you guys are considering as well having the ability to filter out undesirable swells. Anyway, if anybody can answer my question, that would be great

Real time editing

@shammi
Shammi Mohamed
@shammi · 4:03
A good example of that is Cambridge Analytic and how they got the data and what they use the data for. Facebook was quite aware of that and just decided to look the other way. That may not be proven, but if you just connect the dots and everything, you can pretty much see what's happening there. And as far as what needs to be done, I think personally, I do feel this end is a very personal opinion
2
@Vikas
Vikas Gupta
@Vikas · 3:08
And I think the normal course of progression for that post or that message would be that it goes up to some point before it starts to get disseminated to the audience that it is intended for, which is the friends of the person who posted made that post and every step along the way it's going through, I would say call them being forwarded to the recipients and each stage you can actually apply filters. But the simplest one, where you would apply it would be the entry point of that particular post
4
@Howie
Howie Rubin
@Howie · 0:59
And apparently from what you and Channing are saying is that yes, they can and therefore they can be held responsible for the negative content that is published. Of course, it's up to them us whomever to dismiss. Side what is negative content? But my real point is or what I was really concerned about, was could they ultimately be blamed for the content that goes out to the general public
Swell user mugshot
0:000:00